Business & Investment

California Challenges San Bernardino Air Cargo Facility Used by Amazon

California requested the Federal Court of Appeals on Monday to re-examine the proceedings against the new air cargo facility at San Bernardino International Airport, home of the major package hubs for Amazon’s aviation network. Justice Secretary Rob Bonta said the initial decision was inconsistent with existing environmental laws, putting the community at risk from harmful diesel truck and jet emissions.

The Federal Aviation Administration approved the $ 200 million Eastgate Air Cargo Logistics Center in 2019 because of opposition from California and community groups, and in the summer of 2020, by a split panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals in the 9th Circuit. I was able to proceed with the project. .. The Office of the Attorney claims that the FAA has conducted a rough environmental analysis and underestimated the effects of air pollution from increased truck traffic.

The freight center has a 658,500-square-foot warehouse, as well as a ground support building and parking lot for all 14 freighters.

Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) In April of last year, we started operation of aircraft lamps and sorting centers. Online cargo arriving by truck and plane is grouped and redistributed by the outbound aircraft. State officials say that by the middle of the decade, dozens of additional flights and hundreds of truck trips will occur each day, along with at least a ton of toxic air pollutants. According to the airport, Amazon currently operates about nine flights per day.

Located about 60 miles east of Los Angeles Interstate 5, San Bernardino is located in the heart of a vast warehouse area known as the Inland Empire.

Public health advocates and states say that particulate matter and toxic gases in industrial areas disproportionately affect low-income and color communities.

The initial proceedings filed by former Attorney General Xavier Becerra, now the Secretary of Health and Welfare of the Biden administration, will suspend the construction of privately funded air cargo terminals until the FAA completes a comprehensive statement on its environmental impact. And said. Local community.

“It doesn’t matter who you are or how much money you have. When the health and well-being of our community is at stake, you can’t cut corners,” said Attorney Bonta. The Secretary said in a news release. “As a people’s lawyer, I’m committed to raising the voice of communities living at the crossroads of poverty and pollution. The facts are: Like the affected communities of this project in San Bernardino. Communities are often overloaded and lacking resources. These communities, which have already experienced the health hazards of pollution, deserve to be protected to the fullest extent of the law. Through our Department of Environmental Justice, we promise to end this battle. “

According to the California Department of Air Resources, San Bernardino residents are among the top 5% of Californians for asthma-related hospital visits and in the top 3% for heart attack emergency room visits. increase.

The petition from the Attorney General and advocacy group Earth Justice argues that the court’s decision needs to be reviewed for several reasons. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals argues that the authorities are responsible for identifying and analyzing environmental impacts in creating a new burden of proof for petitioners who challenge the FAA’s decision under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Said that it was inconsistent with. The Panel also allowed the FAA to approve the project based on a flawed environmental analysis of uncertain impacts that violates the Cases of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. The petition was unable to document the harmful effects of the Eastgate project, especially due to the lack of transparency of FAA data, so the number of affected people and court time. Ultimately, it claims to be very important because of its value.

The committee that decided the case “allowed the FAA to mistakenly abstain from approval of the project for incomplete and inaccurate analysis in environmental assessment,” the California Department of Justice said in a petition.

If the court agrees to retrial the case, 11 judges will be elected to participate. There were three judges in the first panel.

FedEx (NYSE: FDX) And UPS (NYSE: ups) It is also a tenant of San Bernardino Airport.

Click here for Eric Kulisch’s American Shipper / Freight Waves story.

related news:

California sue to stop large cargo expansion at San Bernardino Airport

Amazon Air Chooses San Bernardino Airport as Western Hub

California Challenges San Bernardino Air Cargo Facility Used by Amazon California Challenges San Bernardino Air Cargo Facility Used by Amazon

Back to top button