Science & Technology

Common medicines contain animal by-products – no FDA regulations to warn patients

There are no FDA regulations to warn patients if the drug is of animal origin.

More doctors and pharmacists are advocating informing patients of the animal by-products of common medicines, according to a new study by. Osteopathic Medical Journal. Common drugs, such as widely used anticoagulants and hormones, are often derived from animal by-products and are prescribed without consulting the patient’s beliefs.

Sarah Reed, a student physician and author of the paper at the Lincoln Memorial University (LMU) Devasque Osteopathy University of Medicine, said: “Putting patients first means communicating with them about the drugs recommended for their care and, in some cases, prescribing alternative options.”

Common animal-derived drugs

Heparinoids are a type of drug that is primarily derived from pigs. These drugs are routinely used as anticoagulants to prevent blood clots and are given in many situations, such as after surgery to prevent a heart attack or further development of blood clots.

Conjugated estrogens are also common and can be used to treat moderate to severe burning and other symptoms of menopause. They are horse-derived hormones.

“Patients who are prescribed a variety of hormone therapies are generally advised to consult their doctor about the content,” said Mary Beth Babos, Ph.D., professor of pharmacology at LMU and lead author of the paper. I am. “For example, there is no oral thyroid hormone on the market that is completely animal-free.”

Existing guidelines

There are no official recommendations in the United States, but other countries have published guidelines for dealing with animal-derived medicines. The first UK guidelines were published in 2004, the Australian guidelines were published in 2007 and updated again in 2019. However, FDA guidelines are still unavailable.

Cultural ability

The authors of the study reviewed previous medical studies and expressed the leaders of major world religions, as some patients adhere to religious doctrines that recommend avoiding the by-products of certain animals. I have identified my position. According to their findings, many religions discourage the use of animal-derived products when they do not need to save human lives.

  • Jewish and Muslim leaders agree that the use of products derived from pigs (usually prohibited in both religions) is only accepted when necessary to protect human life.
  • The Hindu Council of Australia does not consider bovine products, including bovine-derived medicines, tolerable.
  • Sikh and Hindu Vaishnavism leaders oppose the use of animal-derived medications and surgical bandages, which are exempt from emergencies and routine treatments for which there is no alternative.
  • Many Theravada Buddhists and Seventh-day Adventist Christians practice vegetarianism as part of their beliefs and may reject individual animal-derived medical products.
  • Leaders of the denomination of Jehovah’s Witnesses emphasized that followers of this faith would reject products of blood origin.

“Without government guidance, we hope this study will help doctors and prescribers begin conversations with patients about whether to accept animal-derived products,” Reed said. “Ultimately, it is the patient who decides whether the drug is suitable for their lifestyle.”

See: “Animal Drugs: Cultural Considerations and Available Alternatives”
Mary Beth Bavos, Joseph D. Perry, Sarah A. Reed, Sandlab Gariu, Skyler Hill-Nobby, Mary Jewel Allen, Tara K. Cowell, Jade E. Funk, Kaiser F. Kabir, Catherine A. Sullivan, Amber L. Watson And K. Kelli Wethington, March 8, 2021 Osteopathic Medical Journal..
DOI: 10.1515 / jom-2020-0052

Common medicines contain animal by-products – no FDA regulations to warn patients Common medicines contain animal by-products – no FDA regulations to warn patients

Back to top button