Business & Investment

Facebook Oversight Board almost always rejects company on first test by Reuters

© Reuters.File photo: In this figure, the Facebook logo is displayed on the smartphone


Elizabeth Califord

(Reuters)-Determining the first case in history, Facebook Inc The (NASDAQ :) supervisory board released four of five content reviewed by social media companies on Thursday, including a post deleted by Facebook for violating the rules for hate speech and harmful COVID-19 false alarms. I have decided that it is wrong to delete it.

The first ruling shows how the board is independent of the world’s largest social media platform, especially prior to Facebook’s decision to draw attention to whether it is right to suspend former President Donald Trump. Will be scrutinized to confirm.

Facebook has blocked access to Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts because of concerns about further violent anxiety following the January 6 raid on the US Capitol by former presidential supporters. The board said the Trump case was held for public comment on Friday and he has not yet issued a statement to the board.

Facebook said it would follow the board’s decision. Created by Facebook in response to criticisms of how to handle problematic content, the group urged the company to clarify the rules regarding what the platform allows.

The Supervisory Board began hearing the case in October and announced the first case to consider in December. The complete list of board decisions is as follows:

The decision was overturned:

* A post with a photo of a deceased child, including a commentary on the treatment of Uighur Muslims in China.

* Alleged quote from Nazi Minister of Public Affairs Joseph Goebbels, which Facebook deleted for violating its “dangerous individuals and organizations” policy.

* A post by a group claiming that certain drugs can cure COVID-19, which criticized the French government’s response to a pandemic. This case was sent by Facebook, not the user.

* Instagram photo showing a female nipple that Brazilian users said was aimed at raising awareness of breast cancer symptoms. Facebook also said the deletion was an error and restored the post.

Support for the decision:

* A post aimed at displaying historical photos of a church in Baku, Azerbaijan, with a caption that, according to Facebook, shows “contempt” for the people of Azerbaijan and support for Armenia.

Facebook currently has seven days to restore content that the Board has decided should not be removed. The board said it would soon announce another case from the first batch.

The Board has also issued nine non-binding policy recommendations. For example, Facebook needs to notify users of specific rules that have been violated and better define rules for issues such as dangerous groups and false alarms. Facebook does not have to deal with these, but it must respond publicly within 30 days.

In an interview with Reuters, board member Catherine Chen said, “We see that Facebook has some policy issues.” “We want to clarify their policies, especially those related to human rights and freedom of speech. They must be accurate, accessible and well-defined,” she said. I added.

Facebook said in a blog post that COVID-19’s false alarm policy could become clearer and will soon publish updated rules. However, he said he would not change his approach to removing false information during a pandemic.

Facebook’s attention-grabbing content moderation, from temporarily removing the famous Vietnamese war photos of a naked girl fleeing a napalm attack, to failing to crack down on hate speech and misinformation. I have long faced criticism of the problem.

The board said Thursday that it had received 150,000 appeals since it began accepting proceedings in October. It dominates a limited number of controversial decisions.

The board has 20 members, including former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning Schmidt and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Tawakkol Karman.

The group hears about content removed from Facebook’s platform from users who have run out of the company’s appeal process, rather than the remaining content. The limited mission of the board has been the subject of criticism. Facebook itself can ask the board to consider a wide range of content issues.

Before the ruling was announced, a group of Facebook critics called The Real Oversight Board said, “It’s a public relations campaign that obfuscates urgent issues that Facebook can’t constantly address, and continues hate speech and disinformation on the platform. Diffusion. ”

Facebook has promised $ 130 million to fund its board of directors for at least six years.

Facebook Oversight Board almost always rejects company on first test by Reuters Facebook Oversight Board almost always rejects company on first test by Reuters

Back to top button