Guardian’s View on Rugby and Brain Injury: Existential Crisis | Editorial | Opinion – NFL Sports

SPort fans like to miss the Golden Age, but most elite players today are ahead of their predecessors in terms of strength and skill. That may be good for the audience, but increasing the strength of the pitch can have unexpected and tragic consequences.

It is becoming clear that professional rugby players are at increased risk of early dementia caused by head injuries.Parents This week’s report For famous players Participate in groundbreaking proceedings Against the governing body of the sport, which has been accused of not providing adequate protection from concussion. These are men in their early 40s and show very rare neurological symptoms at that age.

The diagnosis is probably chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a repeated knocking effect on the brain, from severe concussion to a discreet ridge that still causes damaging inflammation. The probability that this cluster is a coincidence is virtually zero. It is caused by rugby.Similar patterns apply to other contact sports, especially boxing And American Football..

It is no exaggeration to explain this as an existential threat to sports. Parents will become increasingly reluctant to allow their children to participate. Young athletes will prefer other activities. It can be unconscientious for schools to insist on full contact rugby as part of their sports curriculum, which has a clear impact on the development of future generations of professional players.

More data is needed to understand the magnitude of the problem, but the new situation suggests a particularly dangerous historical moment during the transition from amateur to professional status in the mid-’90s. Immersed in the “old school” macho attitude towards head injuries, the generation knocked on the stoic and was fed into a new machine for intensive full-time training. There is more protection today, but what happens on match day is still ferocious by historical standards. There are many more tackles and racks. The player is bulky. The closer they are to the top of the game, the more dangerous they are to others and themselves.

It was always understood about physical exhaustion. Brain damage is another order of risk. The results explained by the Guardian interviewees are painful readings, Need to hear their story -In particular Governing body of sports..

Retired athletes propose “15 commandments”. This is a series of protection reforms that may protect future generations on and off the pitch. These include limiting tactical replacement, more rigorous screening to detect brain damage (expanding the use of diffusion tensor imaging scans, optimal technology for tasks, etc.), and improving the care of affected individuals. Includes countermeasures. Not all recommendations can be implemented promptly, but authorities need to be constructively and urgently involved.

When the same issue was confirmed in American football, the sports governing body, the NFL, Regulated training To reduce the collision of the player who causes damage. That was in 2011. There is no good reason why professional rugby lacks similar constraints. Sports organizations are notorious for being defensive and slow-moving. The temptation in this case is to wait, postpone the decision, argue about science, and hope it is blown away. It doesn’t become. A wiser way is to predict the magnitude of the crisis and lead the way in dealing with its causes. It retains moral authority in devising solutions. Being late damages the sport’s reputation and exacerbates the terrible harm already done to the player.

– NFL Sports

Guardian’s View on Rugby and Brain Injury: Existential Crisis | Editorial | Opinion Guardian’s View on Rugby and Brain Injury: Existential Crisis | Editorial | Opinion

Back to top button