Orwell Animal Farm Review –

Are there any of us who have never felt we live in Orwell’s nightmare? The author’s name has become synonymous with overwhelming claustrophobic control and has influenced the entire catalog of games from observers to the frankly named Orwell series. The combination of delusional Futurism and the highly realistic technologies available to us today creates an unmistakable, fairly devastating sci-fi dialogue. Although many of these games have been credited in 1984, Orwell’s Animal Farm is directly inspired by another classic Orwell story source, without a science fiction safety net.

Perhaps very correctly, the game promises a more original approach to the story, assuming that the majority of players are already familiar with the story of the animal farm. Instead of unknowingly guiding a worn-out story, there is a branching storyline that can improve the original fate of the animal for a specific purpose. Familiarity with the content of the book does not determine how much you really understand, but being able to predict a particular event can be a beneficial bonus.

At one of the earliest points in the game, you can get a ledger with goals and possible endings after you kick Jones off the farm. It is your job to take on the role of all livestock and explore as many of these paths as possible to ensure that the animal farm thrives without human leaders. This element attempts to quickly separate the animal farm from the obvious visual novel classification, promising multiple endings and a fairly diverse playthrough.

Unfortunately, except that this book is included, it rarely actually encourages multiple playthroughs. Games struggle with simplicity, sometimes making it a useful feature, and others feel cold and dull. The plot is almost second to the soft-managed sim, which consumes most of the play time. The better you play, the less likely it will happen, as you can avoid most of the negative events in the book and make the game repetitive, tragic and rewarding.

Initially, there are regular meetings where you can raise concerns and support a pig-led government. Some animals are resistant from the start and express anxiety during these meetings, so you can choose to allow them to speak or (in some cases) ban participation. This factor diminishes as the game progresses, and animals do not meet very regularly. Obviously, this is intended to represent the exclusion of democracy from the farm, but from a gameplay perspective, it excludes many potential changes from the dialogue.

Apart from these meetings, the rest of the game feels like a soft management sim. You will be given some basic tasks (not all can be completed) and will be asked to prioritize workloads among members of the community. Some animals work harder, but at their own disadvantage, but some take a slow and steady approach. Having a familiar story behind the game means that players are more likely to protect certain individuals. This leads to an interesting reimagination of the work at hand.

The element of choice means that much of what happens isn’t written by Orwell himself, but for their honor, the team manages to create a consistent story. Slow pace can turn off some players, but voice narration works very well with attractive graphics to create ominous oppressive tones.

Animal farms are dominated by audiovisual performance, which is probably the most powerful element of the game. Characters are easily distinguished and drawn by expression and personality. The farm background and changing faces are easy to read and have a minimalist overlay that works very efficiently. The music is properly ominous and all animals are voiced by vibrant and authoritative voice actors. The exciting tones of nationalism and war, the quality of these elements is enough to redeem the game quite significantly.

Animal farms played in the simplest way, using these fascinating visuals and immersive soundtracks, are almost beneficial. A useful educational tool for books. It seems like it can be used as a student companion, but it probably allows for less attractive elements.

There is a feeling that the game may sometimes miss that goal, and it’s painfully clear that it doesn’t always deal with story opportunities. There are often gaps where the story can be witty or truly challenging-and it gets a little flatter. Randomly generated annual tasks are rewarding and the mechanism is never justified. Growing animalism always seems like a retrofit, and there is little energy to do other things on the farm. I can’t say the railroad player in the game in one direction, as I’m clearly aiming to provide a variety of endings, but there’s a bit of a tie.

Unfortunately, it seems unlikely that anyone unfamiliar with this book will do much here. The content of this book is a slow-moving experience with frustrating elements stretched thinly onto the frame of a weak resource management game. For fans of this book, especially students, it may prove a more fulfilling journey, but the divergent story sometimes seems to be a little forced. For games where choice is important, it’s amazing how unimportant the choice is and how slow the game is when all the “right” decisions are made. Thus, perhaps unintentionally, the game provides us with an extraordinary reading of authoritative literature, and while everything on the surface looks great, I think it reduces the actual decisions.


Back to top button