Sports

Why F1 is “very aggressive” towards new engine rules – Motorsports

The move to turbo hybrids in 2014 was right for sustainability reasons and to maintain manufacturer interest, but there was an error in the power unit rules framework.

When putting together the new regulations, engineers were rampant in leading responsibility for the exciting technologies that could be incorporated into 1.4-liter turbos and their energy recovery systems.

The result turned out to be an apparently complex power unit that was very expensive to understand and develop.

In addition to the combination of MGU-H and MGU-K, many design degrees of freedom in the overall concept mean that complexity becomes an expensive challenge for manufacturers, causing many headaches in the early days. Caused.

Honda’s experience of making a mistake in F1 returns served as a deterrent to other manufacturers. And the costs faced by Japanese manufacturers as they headed to the front proved a factor in their final withdrawal from sports.

However, the engines weren’t just bad for the people who designed and implemented them.

The biggest drawback for fans was that they robbed the sport of much of the old screaming V10 and V8 emotions.

The lack of noise was a major complaint, and many sports followers were dissatisfied with the conversion of the Grand Prix to an economy run due to the impact of drivers who had to save fuel.

There was also a mistake in how F1 failed to market some of the positive messages of the power unit.

It has been lost in other criticisms that the sport unleashed the most powerful engine in Grand Prix history and was the most efficient racing engine ever created.

Read again:

It’s clear that F1’s chief will not make the same mistake again, as he has changed his mind about future power unit regulation.

One of the key decisions made during discussions at the F1 Committee meeting on Thursday was the framework for the progress of the transition to the new engine rules.

These were originally scheduled to come into effect in 2026, but the team agreed to move them one year ahead of schedule against the unanimous decision to freeze the engine from 2022.

A working group has now been set up to sort out what the new hybrid F1 engine looks like, with feedback from both current and potentially interested manufacturers.

Its stated purpose has been agreed. They are: Environmental sustainability and social and automotive relevance. Fully sustainable fuel; create a powerful and emotional power unit.Significant cost savings and appeal for new power unit makers

Achieving all these goals is not a job at the moment, but the difference between when the engine was assembled in 2014 and this time is that the F1 chief is exactly where things should go. ..

When the original turbo hybrid rules were developed, FIA President Jean Todt pushed them hard, and F1’s pinnacle Bernie Ecclestone resisted and wasn’t helped by criticizing them everywhere.

Ecclestone is famous for accusing the media of being quiet when the hybrid car first ran in the test. However, because the car was running in Jerez, I returned to my London office and was nearly 1500 miles away.

Not only is the FIA ​​now behind the push, but so is F1 CEO Stefano Domenicali. The approach to the new rules is based on an understanding of F1 needs (because of being a former Ferrari team boss). Manufacturer (from former Lamborghini CEO).

He is confident that he will be able to formulate power unit rules that will satisfy both manufacturers and fans and can attract car makers who are not currently involved in F1.

However, resolving the rules in the right way is not easy. Therefore, he vowed not to sit down and repeat the mistakes of the past.

Recently, talking about his view of the rule debate, Domenicali clarified where the front was drawn.

“Start with the costs and investments required to make it attractive for other OEMs to build engines or become part of engine and chassis manufacturing, despite being a very relevant technology. You need to, “he said. ..

“Therefore, engine and cost are the big equations needed to start the discussion. We need to be very aggressive.

“But from a technical point of view, I can assure you that you are attacking the right points that are the basis for maintaining interest in the platform.”

The discussions in the coming months will inevitably run into some obstacles, but the fact that it began with a clear and agreed goal that F1 was decided to be hit in 2025. It is a precursor to what will be unleashed in the beginning.

Related Videos

– Motorsports

Why F1 is “very aggressive” towards new engine rules

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/very-aggressive-new-engine-rules/5387642/?utm_source=RSS&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=RSS-ALL&utm_term=News&utm_content=www Why F1 is “very aggressive” towards new engine rules

Back to top button